About Performix

Performance is a system.We make the system measurable.

Performix is a protected-feedback and performance-intelligence platform. The diagnostic is real. The substrate is research-grade. The system is built to learn — narrowing in on what matters for your team rather than running every team through the same laundry list.

CAMS — the foundational model

Performance is conjunctive. Find the one starving condition. Apply resource only there.

CAMS · FOUR CONDITIONS OF TEAM PERFORMANCECAPABILITY92%ALIGNMENT88%MOTIVATION90%SUPPORT30%STARVINGPerformance is conjunctive. The binding constraint is the one starving condition — apply resource only there.

Capability, Alignment, Motivation, and Support are conjunctive — when any one is starving, performance follows. The diagnostic refuses the laundry list of “best practices” by design. The recommendation is one accountable action against the binding condition.

Three doors · one engine

Same diagnostic kernel. Three buyer conversations. The doors change; the product doesn't.

THREE DOORS · SAME ENGINESales performance varianceCRO · RevOps · PE op partnerAI transformation readinessChief AI Officer · COO · CHROPost-acquisition integrationChief Integration Officer · PE op partnerProtected feedback + CAMS diagnostic + Insight PlayerONE ENGINE

The same diagnostic kernel powers each vertical. The doors change the buyer conversation, not the product.

Architecture · precompute and playback

Metrics are computed once, on a schedule. The player never recomputes — it plays back insights already stored.

Precompute and Playback

IngestionSuppression gateSegmentationCAMS scoringInsight compositionStorage — Insights, Charts, Smart ListsPlayerREAD-ONLYLibraryREAD-ONLYNotifications + Briefing exportsREAD-ONLY

Metrics are computed once, on a schedule. The player never recomputes — it plays back insights already stored.

Performix is not a dashboard you build. It is a player that plays back insights that have already been computed, scored, and suppression-checked upstream. The wall between compute and render is load-bearing — it is what makes the player feel inevitable and the executive view trustworthy.

Why now

The substrate is the product. AI did the ingest; the substance came from the literature.

WHY THIS IS POSSIBLE NOW

Peer-reviewed research · booksAI EXTRACTFindingsclaims extracted from sourcesConstructswhat each finding is aboutMeasures (survey items)how each construct is observedEvidence weightshow strong the support isFEEDSCAMS diagnostic +Insight compositionPerformix

Pre-LLM, ingesting the I-O psychology literature into a structured measurement substrate was uneconomical. Now it isn't. The diagnostic substrate is the AI product; the rest is craft.

Every survey item in Performix traces back through a chain — source paper, finding, construct, validated measure — to a specific finding in peer-reviewed I/O psychology and organizational behavior research. Pre-LLM, ingesting that literature into a structured measurement substrate was uneconomical. Now it isn't. That is the AI claim.

The substrate, made browseable

Performance Science Library

Every evidence pill in Performix traces back through this library. Source papers and books are ingested by the Research-to-Model Engine; constructs, validated measures, and survey items are derived from them and weighted by evidence strength. Browse the live library →

59 sources
72 findings
3 constructs
4 survey items
last update 2026-05-23
BOOK

Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Ingested 2026-03-14 · 23 findings extracted · 14 constructs derived · 41 survey items derived

Cross-functional teams require psychological safety and clear handoff norms to maintain response time as complexity grows.
pp. 87-104strong
Constructs derived (3)
Cross-functional response timeSUPPORT
Survey items (4 · in active rotation)
This team can get answers from other teams quickly when blocked.
When this team needs work from a partner team, the work usually arrives in time.
Cross-team commitments to this team are reliably met.
When a cross-team handoff is delayed, this team knows who to escalate to.

Evidence weight: 0.84 · IRT difficulty range: -1.2 to +0.6 · last calibration: 2026-05-04

Handoff clarityALIGNMENT
Cross-team psychological safetyCAPABILITY
Speaking-up behavior is suppressed when leaders interpret dissent as defection.
pp. 41-58strong
Team learning is bottlenecked by the highest-status member's tolerance for being wrong.
pp. 162-181moderate
Psychological safety and accountability are conjunctive; either alone reduces performance.
pp. 31-40strong
Hybrid-team safety degrades when synchronous-only norms persist.
pp. 218-234preliminary

System of learning

Start with the minimum load-bearing instrument. Narrow in fast. Pay for depth only where it moves the needle.

PERFORMIX · SYSTEM OF LEARNINGCAMS · NAV — minimum load-bearing instrumentWhat's the binding constraint? What's the value of moving it?PROBABILISTIC NARROWINGCapabilityAlignmentMotivationSupportCross-functionalresponse timeTooling fitResourcesufficiencyVOI-GATED DEEPER ANALYTICSQuick remedyConvene cross-functional working session;identify top 3 handoffs.HIGH VOI · LOW COSTSelection & evaluation rubric refreshRequires confirmed job specs; pulls intojob-spec authoring.MED VOI · MED COST · NEEDS EXEC APPROVALOrg-wide cross-team comparative studyPulls all teams' Support subconstructheatmaps; longitudinal.LOW VOI THIS QUARTER · HIGH COSTPerformix starts with the minimum load-bearing instrument and probabilistically selects each next step.Deeper analytic tracks are gated by the expected value of the information they would yield.

Performix starts with the minimum load-bearing instrument — CAMS — and probabilistically selects what to ask next based on what your team's answers have already revealed. Deeper analytic tracks are gated by the expected value of the information they would yield. This is what the engine looks like running.

Three teams · three remedies

Same instrument. Different teams. Wildly different recommendations — because the binding constraint is different for each.

SAME INSTRUMENT · DIFFERENT TEAMS · DIFFERENT REMEDIESCAMS · NAV — minimum load-bearing instrumentTeam ACapabilitySelection & evaluation rubric gapRefresh selection criteria;confirm job specsMED VOI · NEEDS EXEC APPROVALTeam BMotivationPerceived fairness; recognition gapManager 1:1 coaching loop +fairness pulseHIGH VOI · LOW COSTTeam CSupportCross-functional response timeCross-functional workingsession; assign ownersHIGH VOI · LOW COSTSame instrument, three teams, three different remedies. The engine routes resource to where it actually moves the needle for this team.

Design discipline

Don't build separate survey forms. Feedback is inherent to documents.

ONE PRIMITIVE · THREE USES

12345<FeedbackInstrument>Rate a doc section (job-spec authoring)Rate your team on a CAMS statementRate an intervention's fit (action-loop follow-up)

Feedback is inherent to documents. The same widget rates a job spec section, a CAMS item, and an intervention's fit — never a separate survey form.

One primitive backs three uses across Performix: rate a doc section, rate your team on a CAMS statement, rate an intervention's fit. The widget never displaces — once you answer, the picked choice highlights and a “change?” affordance stays in place. This is how feedback becomes part of the work instead of running parallel to it.

The widget, in flow

Binding-constraint diagnostic

Rate each statement for your team. As your responses come in, Performix identifies which of Capability, Alignment, Motivation, or Support is the dimension currently starving your team's performance — so you can apply resource where it actually moves the needle, rather than treating every dimension at once.

Team: Acme Engineering — Platform Group · Priya Mehta · 11 members

CapabilitySupport starting to lean (3 items so far)

This team has the technical skills required to deliver on its current commitments.

Answered: 4Mostly true ·

This team has the time required to do its work to the standard the team itself wants to meet.

This team can get answers from other teams quickly when blocked.

Consumer · not fork

Performix vendors typed contracts of six analytical services. The algorithms live elsewhere.

CONSUMER · NOT FORKPerformixPlayer · Library · Diagnostic · Insight compositionTYPED CONTRACTS (Zod schemas, type signatures, endpoint registries)vendored contractReincarnationadaptive psychometricvendored contractPreference Modelerresponse brainvendored contractData AnonymizerPII suppressionvendored contractSegmentation StudioHRIS normalizationvendored contractCalculusstatistical enrichmentvendored contractMeta-Factoryjob_family_agentPerformix consumes typed contracts of six services. The algorithms liveelsewhere; when a service updates, Performix benefits with zero code change here.

When a service updates, Performix benefits with zero code change here. The boundary is enforced by typed contracts vendored at known versions — the same pattern Performix then exports to downstream consumers like the public consulting site and the AI-encyclopedia surface.

Operator surface

The diagnostic is only as good as the roster behind it. The roster is auto-mapped with per-column confidence.

Map columns to the canonical schema

We've inferred a mapping for each column in acme-platform-roster.csv from the column name, sampled values, and the canonical schema. Confirm or override; unmapped columns will be ignored.

8 of 8 fields mapped
Canonical fieldSource columnSample valuesConfidenceStatus
employee.id
textRequired
E10481E10482
96%
Mapped
employee.fullName
textRequired
Priya MehtaJordan Lee
94%
Mapped
manager.email
emailRequired
priya.mehta@acme.examplej.lee@acme.example
91%
Mapped
employee.jobTitle
textRequired
Senior Software EngineerEngineering Manager
89%
Mapped
employee.department
text
PlatformInfrastructure
88%
Mapped
employee.hireDate
dateRequired
2022-03-142021-08-02
93%
Mapped
employee.location
text
NYCRemote-US
72%
Mapped
employee.employmentType
text
FTFT
81%
Mapped
Why this mapping — MgrEmail → manager.email
Column-name similarity0.92
Value pattern (email regex)0.88
Header position (typical HRIS exports)0.75
Combined0.91

The first time a team is onboarded, the operator uploads a CSV from their HRIS. Performix infers the mapping to the canonical schema column-by-column, surfaces a confidence score for each inference, and opens up the reasoning — column-name similarity, value pattern, header position — so the operator can override before anything downstream runs. No black-box pipeline.

Working with us directly

Some organizations engage Performix as a tool. Others engage the practice that built it — to run the diagnostic with you, interpret the result, and design the intervention. See the consulting engagement shape →