Team Performance Science Guide · books
We read the performance-science literature so you don't have to.
22 books and clusters, each read CAMS-native — not summarized but argued with. Every profile names what the book actually claims, where it stands against the binding-constraint thesis, and which part of the Guide it grounds.
Allies (16)
Sources whose science we build on — the foundations under CAMS, the levers, and measurement-as-estimation.
The Knowing-Doing Gap
AllyJeffrey Pfeffer & Robert I. Sutton · 2000
The thesis anchor: the hard part isn't knowing what to do, it's doing it — and badly designed measurement is named as one of the biggest barriers. One load-bearing caution for us, too.
Read the profilePerformance Management (OBM)
AllyAubrey C. Daniels & James E. Daniels · Behavioral / OBM
The diagnostic mindset done right one level down — at behavior. Where the orthodoxy prescribes everything at once, Daniels isolates the behavior that drives the result.
Read the profileFundamentals of Performance Technology (HPT cluster)
AllyVan Tiem, Moseley & Dessinger; ISPI lineage · HPT/HPI lineage
The closest ancestor to CAMS in the corpus: the Behavior Engineering Model already separates environmental supports from individual capability. We owe it our Support and Capability framing.
Read the profileThe Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory
AllyRichard M. Ryan (ed.) · OUP
The academic foundation directly under the Motivation dimension. SDT's autonomy / competence / relatedness gives Motivation a measurable internal structure rather than a vibe.
Read the profileThe Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
AllyK. Anders Ericsson et al. (eds.) · Expertise science
The science under the develop-in-place lever — and a sharp contrast on how Capability should be measured. Expertise is built, not innate, which is what makes development a lever at all.
Read the profileThe Turnover Canon
AllyMobley · Mowday/Porter/Steers · Hom & Griffeth · Allen · Turnover / retention science
The science under the manage-exit-risk lever, and the mirror of our Attraction and Attrition instruments. Turnover is the most-modeled outcome in the field — we inherit its measurement, not its surveys.
Read the profileRethinking Performance Measurement
AllyMarshall W. Meyer · 2002
The most psychometrically sophisticated critic in the measurement cluster. Meyer's "running down" of measures is exactly the pathology our value-of-information gate is built to resist.
Read the profileStrategic Performance Management
AllyBernard Marr · 2006
Value-driver mapping at the organizational level — the same move as our "never surface a raw operational measure; convert it to value" design law, written for the balance sheet.
Read the profileCoaching cluster
AllyCarter & McMahon · Rothwell & Bakhshandeh · Coaching / development
Develop-in-place plus the embedded, on-the-job feedback that backs our no-separate-survey rule — Carter & McMahon especially. Rothwell reads more as how-to with promotional stats.
Read the profilePeople and Performance
AllyPeter Drucker · Foundational management
The philosophical cornerstone for measurement-as-self-control rather than measurement-as-surveillance — the posture our protected-feedback design depends on.
Read the profileThe Halo Effect
AllyPhil Rosenzweig · 2007
The survivorship-and-attribution critique that backs the impossible-checklist argument: most business "best practice" is a halo drawn backward from outcomes we already know.
Read the profileThe Success Equation
AllyMichael J. Mauboussin · 2012
The intellectual basis of "rule out chance before you credit skill" — the discipline behind our value model and why we report uncertainty instead of point verdicts.
Read the profileNoise: A Flaw in Human Judgment
AllyDaniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony & Cass R. Sunstein · 2021
The why-measure-don't-opine case in full. The idiosyncratic-rater effect is the single best argument for estimating constructs instead of collecting opinions.
Read the profileHuman Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance
AllyThomas F. Gilbert · 1978
The primary source for the Behavior Engineering Model — Gilbert direct, not secondhand. Worthy performance as accomplishment over behavior is the root of our value-not-activity stance.
Read the profileUnderstanding Performance Appraisal
AllyKevin R. Murphy & Jeanette N. Cleveland · 1995
The science of why ratings aren't accurate — appraisal as a social and goal-directed act, not a measurement. It is the empirical case for replacing rating with estimation.
Read the profileSupporting cluster
AllyGoldratt · Pink · Lewis · Epstein · Mlodinow · Illustration / reinforcement
Not new constructs — vivid hooks. The Goal lends the binding-constraint metaphor; Moneyball the measurement wedge; Drive the motivation frame; each reinforces a message we already hold.
Read the profileMixed (3)
Useful in parts — mineable for vocabulary or one real nuance, not adoptable wholesale.
Measurement & Control cluster
MixedNeely · Cokins · Merchant & Van der Stede · Montague · others · Org/strategy measurement
The orthodoxy of organizational measurement — not adoptable wholesale, but a rich vocabulary of measurement pathologies we can name and design against.
Read the profileHBR Performance Management cluster
MixedHarvard Business Review · Practitioner PM
The orthodoxy documenting its own revolt. HBR's "10 Must Reads" is the mainstream admitting the annual review is broken — useful as evidence, not as a how-to.
Read the profileBoost
MixedMichael Bar-Eli · Sport & performance psychology
An individual peak-performance bridge from sport into work, with one real nuance for the Motivation dimension. We take the nuance, not the locker-room frame.
Read the profileOrthodoxy — the foil (2)
The standard view we define ourselves against: prescribe-everything-at-once, rate-don't-estimate.
Performance Management
OrthodoxyHerman Aguinis · 2013 (3rd ed.)
The field's standard graduate textbook — and our cleanest foil. Its sixteen simultaneous "contributions" are the laundry list a binding-constraint diagnostic refuses.
Read the profilePM / reward orthodoxy cluster
OrthodoxyArmstrong · Shields · DK Essential Managers · Mainstream PM & reward
Mostly foil — the textbook orthodoxy of pay-for-performance — with Shields's reward taxonomy as the one mild extractable worth keeping.
Read the profileLeave-out (1)
Read and set aside — overlap or out-of-scope, kept on the shelf for honesty about what we considered.